<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IAHH: International Association of Humane Habitat &#187; Jury Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humanehabitat.org/category/jury-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humanehabitat.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jury Comments for 8th ISDC 2010</title>
		<link>http://humanehabitat.org/jury-comments-for-8th-isdc-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://humanehabitat.org/jury-comments-for-8th-isdc-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arzan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jury Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanehabitat.org/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Report of Jury: 8th IAHH International Student Design Competition 2010
 
Fifty one competition entries from at least one dozen countries were examined by the jury on 27-28 January 2010. Professor Peter Schreibmayer was delayed in travel and joined on the 28th; hence he was unable to participate in the assessment for awards, but assisted in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Report of Jury: 8<sup>th</sup> IAHH International Student Design Competition 2010</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Fifty one competition entries from at least one dozen countries were examined by the jury on 27-28 January 2010. Professor Peter Schreibmayer was delayed in travel and joined on the 28<sup>th</sup>; hence he was unable to participate in the assessment for awards, but assisted in the deliberations.</p>
<p>The competition theme, Affordable Housing in Sustainable Humane Habitats, presented a formidable architectural challenge, and the jury was happy to note that the entries overall addressed very well the relevant issues arising from the theme. Viewpoints varied from a historical perspective of dwellings of indigenous people, to the integration of foreign migrants into the builtscape of industrial societies; from the rehabilitation of slum dwellers trapped in the expanding metropolis, to reinstating marginalized communities in pastoral landscapes being encroached by  machine civilization.</p>
<p>It was noteworthy that the creative energy needed to find design solutions was perhaps derived from a studied focus on the dispossessed and marginalized sections of our societies. Design was approached generally as a process, starting with research into the context of the built environment reinforced with surveys and typological inventories to derive area planning strategies and a building methodology. Given the general high standard of work, the deliberations of the jury were lengthy and intense, leading to the selection of three quite evenly matched award schemes and six schemes for honorable mention.<span id="more-152"></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>1<sup>st</sup> Prize </strong><strong>372574</strong></p>
<p>The first prize was awarded to a design for urban renewal of a historically rooted community in India now surrounded and threatened by the contemporary culture of the metropolis. The significant contribution of the scheme was to try and understand the collective mindscape by a series of surveys, including an inventory of house types, leading to a sensitive adaptation of dwellings while preserving the collective character of the public spaces. The scheme was distinguished by analytical rigour combined with a sensitivity towards plastic form and a generous acceptance of the human condition.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>2nd Prize </strong><strong>260380</strong></p>
<p>The second prize scheme takes up the challenge of communities on the urban fringe in a predominantly agricultural region in Cameroon. The design proposal, to quote from the report, ‘depends on natural resources rather than artificially produced and supplied resources&#8221; and is “ culturally and socially sustainable since it reinforces social values and habits ….” The planned configuration of the built fabric maintains the existing water canals and the vegetation alongside to structure the new neighborhoods. There is an exemplary emphasis on pedestrian mobility, techniques for rainwater harvesting and open space organization for community benefit. A strategy for phased transformation of the  built fabric to integrate new development is demonstrated in the design.</p>
<p><strong>3rd Prize </strong><strong>861203</strong></p>
<p>The third prize scheme addresses the housing requirement of marginalized farming communities in a region in Malaysia where urbanization is causing cultural and environmental degradation. The proposal posits an ecological approach while emphasizing solutions appropriate to the local people, their socio-economic conditions, and the natural environment. The building design sensitively combines modern technology of  a light weigh steel structural framework with vernacular practices using locally sourced materials for infill and containment.</p>
<p>Six schemes were chosen for honorable mention . These  were characterized by:</p>
<ul>
<li>Exemplary site analysis leading to appropriate environmental structuring ;</li>
<li>A historical understanding of traditional building typology extended to cater for contemporary requirements;</li>
<li>Taking up the challenges of recycling the industrial infrastructure in a bold and imaginative way;</li>
<li>Responding to the needs of migrant workers by sensitive re-design to rehabilitate  industrial wasteland;</li>
<li>A close look at the traditional housing o f indigenous people and proposing an architecture to integrate with present realities;</li>
<li>Self-build as an approach to empower the urban poor, negotiating architectural solutions through mediation by not-for- profit people’s organizations like SPARC (Society for Promotion of Area Resource Centre) and NSDF (National Slum Dwellers  Federation).</li>
</ul>
<p>The jury felt that although the standard of presentation was marked by clarity of thought and expression, there was a sense of mismatch between the sensitive appreciation of the fragility of the lives of marginalized people and the hard edge quality of computer generated images in some of the drawings. Yet the jury would like to record its satisfaction  with the high quality of work by entrants to the competition and for their rigorous engagement  with very difficult  but important challenges.   The jury would also like to congratulate IAHH for this effort in the promotion of a valuable cause.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>The jury unanimously decided on the following prizes:</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>1<sup>st</sup> Prize </strong><strong>372574</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Miss. Neelima Panoli</li>
</ul>
<p>Kamala Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute for Architecture and Environmental Studies</p>
<p>Mumbai University, Mumbai, India</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>2nd Prize </strong><strong>260380</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Sara Cipolletti</li>
<li>Deema Mahmud</li>
<li>Angela Leuzzi</li>
<li>Sylvie Laure</li>
<li>Roselyn Tepongning</li>
</ul>
<p>University of Camerino, School of Advanced Studies, Camerino, Italy</p>
<p><strong>3rd Prize </strong><strong>861203</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Mr. Chua Poh Ang</li>
<li>Mr. Lee Swan Peng</li>
<li>Mr. Song Kee Jiunn</li>
<li>Miss. Ng Wen Chiat</li>
</ul>
<p>University Technology Malaysia</p>
<p>Faculty of Built Environment Taman University,</p>
<p>Skudia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>070183</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ms Teresa Moran</li>
</ul>
<p>ETSAM</p>
<p>Escuela Tecnica Superior De Arquitectura de Madrid</p>
<p>Madrid, Spain</p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>7801229</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ms. Masoom Moitra</li>
</ul>
<p>Kamala Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute for Architecture and Environmental Studies</p>
<p>Mumbai University</p>
<p>Mumbai, India</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>122420</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Azam Sadat Hosseini</li>
<li>Solmaz Shamshiri</li>
<li>Zahra Khoshamad</li>
<li>Asghar Motea Noparvar</li>
</ul>
<p>Tabriz University</p>
<p>Tabriz, Iran</p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>678645</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Miss Chunyan Zhao</li>
<li>Miss Lei Zhao</li>
<li>Miss Lin Jin</li>
<li>Mr. Xiao Liu</li>
</ul>
<p>Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School</p>
<p>Shenzhen, China</p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>471712</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Mrs. Duygu Ergin</li>
<li>Mrs. Necla Ruken Bars</li>
<li>Mrs. Aysegul Arkuden</li>
<li>Mr. Oguzhan Sur</li>
</ul>
<p>Yildiz Technical University</p>
<p>Istanbul, Turkey</p>
<p><strong>Special Mention </strong><strong>1989076</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ying Tan</li>
<li>Haiyun Wang</li>
<li>Qianhong Tan</li>
</ul>
<p>School of Architecture of Tsinghua University</p>
<p>Beijing, China</p>
<p><strong>Signed by the members of the Jury of 8<sup>th</sup> IAHH International Student Design Competition</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Peter Schreibmayer</p>
<p>Rodney Harber</p>
<p>Anna Rubbo</p>
<p>Parvin  Ghaemmaghami</p>
<p>Ashish Ganju (chair)</p>
<p>January 28, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humanehabitat.org/jury-comments-for-8th-isdc-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Registration Forms Available</title>
		<link>http://humanehabitat.org/2009-registration-forms-available/</link>
		<comments>http://humanehabitat.org/2009-registration-forms-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arzan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jury Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanehabitat.org/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The registration forms for the 11th ICHH 2009 and the 7th ISDC 2009 are available in our downloads section. 
Please click here to download the appropriate forms.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The registration forms for the 11th ICHH 2009 and the 7th ISDC 2009 are available in our downloads section. </p>
<p>Please click<strong> <a href="http://humanehabitat.org/download/">here </a></strong>to download the appropriate forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humanehabitat.org/2009-registration-forms-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report of the Jury: 5th ISDC 2007</title>
		<link>http://humanehabitat.org/report-of-the-jury-5th-isdc-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://humanehabitat.org/report-of-the-jury-5th-isdc-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>arzan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jury Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humanehabitat.org/report-of-the-jury-5th-isdc-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The jury met on January 24th and 25th , 2007 at the Rizvi College of Architecture, Mumbai, where twenty one projects received from different architecture schools globally, had been displayed.
It was evident that considerable amount of thought and effort had been put in by the students in the presentations. Generally, the concepts were very strong, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jury met on January 24th and 25th , 2007 at the Rizvi College of Architecture, Mumbai, where twenty one projects received from different architecture schools globally, had been displayed.</p>
<p>It was evident that considerable amount of thought and effort had been put in by the students in the presentations. Generally, the concepts were very strong, based upon thorough analysis of the site, its environment and the prevailing socioeconomic conditions of the neighboring communities.</p>
<p>After detailed discussions on the merits of each entry the jury short listed seven projects and decided to award three prizes and &#8217;special mention&#8217; to  the other four projects.</p>
<p><span id="more-38"></span></p>
<p>1st Prize : Entry no. 9 (No. 2706295) &#8211; Tara Paulose</p>
<p>College &#8211; Kamala Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute Of Architecture, Mumbai, India.</p>
<p>A beautifully conceived poetic journey through Nature Park, full of symbolism, takes into its embrace the slum dwellers of Dharavi, unfolding a future full of hope and  promise.</p>
<p>The proposal is highly sensitive to the environment and ably addresses concerns of sustainability in all its aspects. A well thought out and clearly articulated presentation.</p>
<p>2nd Prize : Entry no. 6 (No .0000026) &#8211; Manoj Ajudia,Dhaval Rangani, Nirali Bodhara, Esha Doshi</p>
<p>College &#8211; Sarvajanik College of Engg. &amp; Techology, Surat, Gujarat, India.</p>
<p>A strong historical and contextual analysis forms the basis of this proposal, sensitively linking the community with the project. An excellent, detailed presentation that takes into account the numerous  icons and the human element that makes up the vibrant Navasari community</p>
<p>3rd Prize : Entry no.10 (No4041983) &#8211; Mayuri Sisodia.</p>
<p>College &#8211; Kamala Raheja Vidyanidhi Institute Of Architecture, Mumbai, India.</p>
<p>Pascal Maidan lies between two segregated communities that has witnessed traumatic incidents of communal riots. The proposed civic centre encircling the open, multiuse maidan is seen as &#8220;symbiotic urban commune&#8221; that will work as a catalyst in organizing the neighborhood into a sustainable (and  peaceful) community.</p>
<p>The project sensibly integrates the two communities through a built project that has an inviting external face but looks inwards into the large, green,  friendly maidan.</p>
<p>SPECIAL MENTIONS: -</p>
<p>Entry No.3 (No.7825381) &#8211; Carole Levesque, Rim Ben Fredj</p>
<p>Ecole D&#8217;Architecture Montreal, Canada.</p>
<p>Entry NO.2 (No.4602002) &#8211; Jakchai Singhanart, Poom Panusittikorn, Smix Phuangrach, Supakij Homthong, Nattanai Sangvarce</p>
<p>Department of Architecture, Bangkok , Thailand</p>
<p>Entry NO.7 (No.5085373) &#8211; Shi Yang, Li Shaojun</p>
<p>School of Architecture , Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing, China</p>
<p>Entry NO.13(No.9767124) &#8211; Vedashree Jathar, Minal Rathi, Ahana Bodadia,</p>
<p>Ruchi Gupta, Trupti Sanchani</p>
<p>M. M. Department of Architecture, LAD College, Nagpur, India.</p>
<p>The members of the jury would like to place on record their appreciation for the excellent arrangements made for display of the projects and for  facilitating the members in carrying out the assessment.</p>
<p>MEMBERS OF THE JURY :</p>
<p>Ar. Syed Akeel Bilgrami Chairman Karachi, Pakistan</p>
<p>Prof.Dr. Parvin Ghaemmaghami Tehran, Iran</p>
<p>Prof. Dr. Ashraf Salama Doha, Qatar</p>
<p>Prof. Dr. S. M. Akhtar New Delhi, India</p>
<p>Ar. Narendra Dengle Pune, India</p>
<p>Prof. Anil Nagrath Technical Co-ordinator Mumbai, India</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humanehabitat.org/report-of-the-jury-5th-isdc-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
